What the seizure record measures
ObservationA quantity authorities reported as seized—not estimated total supply.
GrainCountry + substance category + reporting year.
Coverage2019–2023 kilograms in the current Annex 7.1 extract; absent rows stay absent.
The dataset contains many named substances and roll-up categories. NarcoScope prevents totals and their components from being casually double-counted, and it separates reporting gaps from true zeros wherever the source permits.
Questions the data can—and cannot—answer
What does drug seizure data measure?
It records an administrative event: authorities reported taking custody of a stated quantity in a stated period. It therefore reflects enforcement reach, case mix and reporting systems as well as the underlying activity.
Do higher seizures mean more trafficking?
Not automatically. One large case can dominate an annual total; a new enforcement operation can raise seizures even if flows are unchanged; weaker reporting can lower the number. A trafficking-volume claim needs independent modalities.
Can aggregate totals identify a route?
No. Country-year quantities do not contain enough case-level origin, transit and destination information to establish a route. Even when an official incident names an origin, that label is an observation in a record—not proof of national responsibility or cause.
Interpretation boundary: report seizures as reported seizures. Do not relabel the total as production, availability, consumption, trafficking volume or enforcement success without separate evidence and an explicit method.
Use the record responsibly
- Name the source year, substance category and unit.
- Inspect whether a total category overlaps with named components before summing.
- Show outlier cases and reporting gaps rather than smoothing them away.
- Corroborate any market or route interpretation with independent harm, price, trade or case evidence.